Showing posts with label Legislation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Legislation. Show all posts

Friday, November 27, 2009

COMMUNICATIONS. "The Insolence of Office."


Philadelphia, Nov. 20.

Editor Horseless Age:

In the test of the regulation of the Fairmount Park Commission
much more is involved than the mere question of
whether or not the park or certain roads of the park shall be
closed to automobiles. The case before us is not one created
intentionally. It was quite accidental and the result of
inadvertence and insufficient knowledge of a rather vague regulation
on one part and on the other part undue, heedless,
indiscreet severity.

The real issue is to restrain the "insolence of office."
Our guards are vested with power necessarily, and by reason
of the very rare appeal from their actions, little by little
they lose the sense of fitness in the enforcement of rules.
More than this, there is involved a resistance to high-handed,
unauthorized, unlawful police violence against the public.
And still deeper there is a laying bare of the ill-considered,
crude legislation from which we suffer so much. The laws
drafted ordinarily, when thev are under fire, are shown up to be
vague, ambiguous and really unenforceable.

Respectfullv yours.
JULES JUNKER.

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

Temporary Inconvenience and Dangers

Among the recent legal decisions affecting
the rights of automobilists on the public
highways, is the clear and strong opinion
by Judge Sutherland of the Rochester
municipal court, of New York. The conclusions
of the judge, as stated in that
opinion, are undoubtedly good law, and
the breadth of view displayed in that
opinion has been a material aid to the
whole industry. The concluding remarks
In the opinion referred to are as follows:

"The temporary inconvenience and dangers
incident to the introduction of these
modern and practical modes of travel
upon the highway must be subordinate
to the larger and permanent benefits to
the general public resulting from the
adoption of the improvements which science
and inventive skill have perfected."

Monday, September 21, 2009

The Coast is Clear


With the exception of New York State, the coast is apparently
clear for the motor vehicle throughout the United
States. License laws and speed laws are being discussed and
will in some instances be enacted, but from the present outlook
the motor vehicle will not be burdened with adverse
legislation to any great extent, nor for any great length of
time. Speed laws are reasonable and necessary; license laws
are not with the probable exception of some classes of steam
vehicles which may have to be subjected to some kind of
supervision by the authorities.

In point of legal status, therefore, motor vehicle manufacturers
have little cause for complaint and it will be their
own fault if the coast does not remain clear for them.

Sunday, September 20, 2009

Dead Letter Laws


As predicted by the editor of The Horseless Age, the park
authorities who have been so injudicious as to exclude motor
vehicles from their confines are offering but a feeble resistance
to violators of their ordinances. Having stirred up a
perfect hornets' nest of criticism from all sides, they are quite
content to save their official dignity by letting the matter
drop as quickly as it will. They had not counted on the popularity
of the motor vehicle, and to public; opinion, must all
publjc servants bow

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Want All Motor Vehicles Licensed

The aldermen of Boston are wrestling with an ordinance to
compel the licensing of all motor vehicles. The ordinance introduced
reads as follows :
Nor shall any owner or driver of any vehicle drive it or permit it to be driven on the streets of Boston by power of steam, gas, gasolene, naphtha, compressed air, electricity or combination of any or all without a permit from the Board of Aldermen.
There is no shallow of justification for the licensing of motor
vehicles, unless all vehicles are to be licensed. The motor
vehicle is not a road destroyer like the horse, but a road
maker; it is safer and more manageable than a horse; it will
relieve the congestion of the streets and facilitate travel and
traffic in general. How, then, can it rightly be subject to
restrictions from which horse vehicles are exempt?


This matter was quite fully discussed in our issue of April
11, and it is safe to say now, as was said then, that any such
general ordinance as that cited above would quickly become a
dead letter if the lawmakers are foolish enough to pass it.